Nissan Micra 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.7 seconds | 19.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 54 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`390 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |