Nissan Micra 2000 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra 2000 engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan Micra 1998, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Nissan Micra 1998. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Nissan Micra 2000 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 2000 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Micra 1998, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Nissan Micra 2000 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |