Nissan Micra 2000 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra 2000 engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan Micra 1998, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Nissan Micra 1998. Thanks to more power Nissan Micra 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra 2000 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra 1998, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 2000 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Micra 1998, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Nissan Micra 2000 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |