Nissan Micra 2003 vs Nissan Note 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 HP | 88 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Nissan Micra and Nissan Note have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 36 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1332 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 91 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 748 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`546 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Note has
| |