Nissan Micra 2005 vs Ford Focus 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Nissan Micra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.45 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 62 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 385 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1247 litres | |
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 134 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 663 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Focus, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Ford Focus has
| |