Nissan Micra 2008 vs Ford Fiesta 2008

 
Nissan Micra
2008 - 2011
Ford Fiesta
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 86 HP90 HP
Torque: 200 NM204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds11.9 seconds
Nissan Micra engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Ford Fiesta.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.2
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1250 km on highway
Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.73 m3.95 m
Width: 1.66 m1.72 m
Height: 1.54 m1.48 m
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Micra is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data979 litres
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space.
Nissan Micra has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`555
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably better
Average price (€): 32002800
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Fiesta has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • higher safety
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv