Nissan Micra 2008 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Micra engine produces 4 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 12 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Despite less power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 53 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |