Nissan Micra 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 50 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 99 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 166 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |