Nissan Micra 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Micra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Micra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Note | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 35 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |