Nissan Micra 1998 vs Nissan Micra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 NM | 80 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra 1998 engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Micra 2000, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Micra 2000. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1998 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 2000, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Nissan Micra 1998 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |