Nissan Micra 2000 vs Mazda Demio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 63 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 103 - 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 13 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 6.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Demio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Demio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1298 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 125 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Demio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 338 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |