Nissan Micra 2000 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 107 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |