Nissan Micra 2000 vs Nissan Almera 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 75 - 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 116 - 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 11 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 6.1 - 8.2 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 39 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 134 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`591 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |