Nissan Micra 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 90 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 200 NM | 130 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 8.1 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.8 | 5.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 50 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 103 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 373 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |