Nissan Micra 2013 vs Nissan Note 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 110 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 32 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Note has
| |