Nissan Micra 2013 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger. Nissan Micra is 19 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 65 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |