Nissan Cube 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 36 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Nemo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller. Nissan Cube is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Nemo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 356 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Cube scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |