Nissan Cube 2009 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 32 HP more power than Nissan Note, but torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Note. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 3.6 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Cube could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Cube is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1645 litres | no data | |
| Nissan Cube has 2 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Note scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Nissan Note has
| |