Nissan Cube 2010 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 73 HP | |
Torque: | 153 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
Nissan Cube is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Cube engine produces 37 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan Cube gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.98 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Nissan Cube is 2 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | no data | |
Citroen Nemo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Cube has 101 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. This could mean that the Nissan Cube uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | |||
Nissan Cube scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |