Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Nissan Almera 2003
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 2 HP more power than Nissan Almera, but torque is 18 NM less than Nissan Almera. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera Tino can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Almera Tino version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger. Nissan Almera Tino is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1020 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera Tino has 85 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |