Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 73 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 132 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 41 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera Tino engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Used also on Toyota Corolla | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.41 m | |
Nissan Almera Tino is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
Toyota Carina E has more luggage space. Nissan Almera Tino has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |