Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Nissan Almera Tino 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino 2000 engine produces 2 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino 2003, but torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino 2003. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 3 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera Tino 2000 and Nissan Almera Tino 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1950 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino 2000 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino 2003. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
| |