Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera Tino 2000 engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino 2003, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino 2003. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera Tino 2000 and Nissan Almera Tino 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
| |