Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2002

 
Nissan Almera Tino
2000 - 2003
Renault Scenic
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 114 HP115 HP
Torque: 158 NM164 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.9 seconds
Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Renault Scenic.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data7.8
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan SentraUsed also on Renault Megane
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Renault Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.17 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.61 m1.68 m
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but lower.
Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1950 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`350
Safety:
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera Tino has
  • timing chain engine
Renault Scenic has
  • timing belt engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv