Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Toyota Corolla 2007
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 45 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan 200 SX consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan 200 SX could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan 200 SX consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Corolla) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 130 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |