Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Opel Calibra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available only with rear wheel drive, while Opel Calibra can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 170 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.8 - 11.2 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Calibra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan 200 SX is 5 cm longer than the Opel Calibra, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 980 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 20 litres more trunk space than the Opel Calibra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | ~ 1`692 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Opel Calibra has
| |