Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available only with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |