Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Dodge Stealth 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Stealth can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 166 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 251 - 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.2 - 12.6 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Stealth. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.25 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller, but higher. Nissan 200 SX is 3 cm shorter than the Dodge Stealth, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 440 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 5 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Stealth. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Dodge Stealth has
| |