Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 49 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1714 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Star has 158 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 344 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |