Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Honda Accord 1998

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
1998 - 2002
Honda Accord
1998 - 2001
Body: Minivan / MPVSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 112 HP136 HP
Torque: 157 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds10.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 24 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda Accord. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.4
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 23 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi GalantUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.60 m
Width: 1.72 m1.75 m
Height: 1.52 m1.43 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 57 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: no data10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`890
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv