Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Renault Scenic 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | Used also on Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |