Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 26 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 430 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |