Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Honda Accord 1998
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 34 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 40 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 57 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Honda Accord has
| |