Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2001

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2001 - 2002
Renault Scenic
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 102 HP105 HP
Torque: 215 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12.8 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 15 NM more than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1220 km on highway
960 km with real consumption890 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years8 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.17 m
Width: 1.72 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.68 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`300
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv