Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 26 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 430 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |