Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Honda Accord 1998

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2001 - 2002
Honda Accord
1998 - 2001
Body: Minivan / MPVSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 98 HP115 HP
Torque: 150 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds12.2 seconds
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 17 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 10 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.2
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway950 km on highway
630 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.60 m
Width: 1.72 m1.75 m
Height: 1.52 m1.43 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 57 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 9.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6901`740
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv