Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 49 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1714 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Star has 158 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 344 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |