Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 141 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 19 HP more power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Hyundai Matrix. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 23 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |