Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but torque is 87 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 55 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1930 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |