Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 55 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |