Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 31 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |