Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |