Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Hyundai Matrix
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 112 HP123 HP
Torque: 157 NM161 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.3 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Hyundai Matrix. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.5
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 23 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi GalantInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.02 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.52 m1.64 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1284 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Hyundai Matrix has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv