Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Renault Kangoo 2003

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Renault Kangoo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 98 HP95 HP
Torque: 150 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Renault Kangoo.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.0
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres50 litres

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years25 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi LancerInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.00 m
Width: 1.72 m1.66 m
Height: 1.52 m1.83 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 31 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2600 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`620
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 10001600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • lower price
Renault Kangoo has
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv