Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Honda Jazz
2004 - 2007
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 86 HP83 HP
Torque: 117 NM119 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds12.9 seconds
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 2 NM less than Honda Jazz. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.85.7
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway850 km on highway
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m3.84 m
Width: 1.72 m1.68 m
Height: 1.52 m1.52 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1323 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1351`470
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 10001800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Honda Jazz has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv