Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Volkswagen Up!. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |