Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 75 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 146 - 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 11.2 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 7.9 - 10.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 48 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1714 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Star has 158 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 344 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`927 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |