Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Honda Accord 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 115 - 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 140 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 7.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 8.2 - 9.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 57 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Honda Accord has
| |