Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Renault Scenic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 80 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |