Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Nissan Cube 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 122 HP | 82 - 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 215 NM | 106 - 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.9 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Cube. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.61 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Cube, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 190 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Cube. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`698 | ~ 1`319 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Nissan Cube has
| |